2013 Seminar | Robertson-Wesley United Church, Edmonton, Alberta

February 24, 2014

The Spiritual Arts Collective 


By Mark Koyama, M.Div.’15

Reverend Karen Bridges put down her blue pen and picked up a red one.  Presently, she put down the red pen in favor of a black one.  And then, back to red.  When she noticed my raised eyebrows, she smiled and slid her sketchbook over the table to give me a closer look.

“Red is for important themes.”  She whispered.

The page was a pastiche of color—her notes meandering and clustering capriciously over its expanse. 

“Plenty of red,” she said, sotto voce.

We were in the midst of the first plenary on the first day of the ISM Congregations Project, and though our feet were barely wet, it was already abundantly clear (or should I say “red”) that Karen, was getting a lot out of it. 

And the casual way that Karen took the pedestrian act of taking notes and gave it panache… well, it was more then charming—it was a welcome confirmation of my best hope.  I’d read the profile for the Robertson-Wesley United Church (henceforth “RWUC”) and was impressed by the barely contained dynamism I found there.  This church, I thought, was poised to try new and exciting things.

RWUC’s website identifies Reverend Karen Bridges as their “Minister of Congregation and Community Development,” a title that smacks a bit too corporate until it dawns on you that Karen herself is that “and” in human form – the one that connects congregation and community.  With a double-major bachelor’s in theater and religion, over a decade of youth ministry work, a Master of Theological Studies and a denominational diploma to her credit, Reverend Bridges’ has perfected the art of transforming potential energy into kinetic energy, idea into action, notion into movement, theology into praxis. 

Add Tammy-Jo Mortensen, RWUC’s music director, and Casey Edmunds, an accomplished dancer/choreographer and singer, to the mix, and performance spontaneously generates.  To introduce themselves and their church, a slide show by itself just wouldn’t cut it.  Pictures of the RWUC community appeared in counterpoint with the verses of an anthem that sang an ethic of radical inclusivity. The positive present tense-ness of RWUC’s spirit came through Tammy-Jo’s legato meditations from the piano and Casey’s encircling, gestural dance.  The cycle even included an impromptu painting that was revealed at its conclusion.

It was a risky move – it might easily have bombed.  But no—it was impressive.  Hitting the sweet spot between “too many cooks in the kitchen” and “many hands make light work,” RWUC’s introduction was the product of a functioning collective of artistic minds.  Artistic minds brought together by the Spirit.

And the point was manifestly evident to all present: RWUC’s introduction-cum-performance was, itself, an elegant rendering—an enactment in living modes—of the project that Karen, Tammy-Jo and Casey had come all the way from Alberta to polish and share.

 

Spiritual Arts Collective

The Spiritual Arts Collective Project springs organically from the Matthian promise sown into RWUC’s mission statement – that “where two or three are gathered in my name, I am there among them” (Matt 18:20).  The project’s central premise is that collaborative creativity (where two or three are gathered) is a process that, by its very nature, summons the Spirit (“I am there”).  The art that results gives new meaning to both church and community.

But creativity, that evanescent and unpredictable sprite, cannot be taken for granted – it must be wooed.  To this end, Karen, Tammy-Jo and Casey have been brainstorming the logistics of fruition. Fortunately, each of them has experience being an artist in a collective project, and each also has relevant administrative experience.  They’ve walked the walk so they’re prepared to talk the talk.

The fulcrum around which RWUC’s Spiritual Arts Collective Project will turn is Casey Edmunds, who is its grant-funded program curator.  In  consultation with his colleagues Karen and Tammy-Jo, Casey will publicize and promote the project during church events, in this way assembling the curious.  He will then recruit four artists-in-residence (poets? painters? dancers? musicians? videographers?) whose flint will ignite the gathered tinder. A premium will be placed on artistic freedom—guidance being limited to the prescription of an overarching theme.  The resulting alchemy will have 2 months to mature and form into a collaborative work of art that, upon completion, will be presented to the larger community (including but not limited to the congregation). The cycle will then repeat, making use of lessons learned.

It’s a risky move.  To be sure, there is no lack of precedent for the collaborative efforts of artists and ecclesial bodies – but unlike the sculptors and glaziers of Medieval Europe who were firmly under the thumb of their pious taskmasters, 21st century artists, who have Dadaism and the avant-garde at their beck, may not be so obliging.  A collective that sets sail with little more then a theme to fill its sails and an artist at its helm, may soon find itself in uncharted waters.  The results may be threatening or subversive.  How does RWUC’s ethos square with this possibility?

When I asked Karen this question, she matter-of-factly placed her trust in the wisdom of the collective and the presence of the Spirit. To hobble artistic freedom would be tantamount to clipping the wings of the Spirit.  The whole idea at the heart of the Spiritual Arts Collective is that art, in its present tense, creates as God created.  Besides, are we so sure that the artist is the only threat? Who knows, maybe it is through the incendiary matrix of art and gospel that we can be recalled to the destabilizing strain within the truths that Jesus taught us.

Effective art is threatening because it is about transformation.  A similar assertion can certainly be made about the church – though in church, the threat is decidedly inflected by a community’s awareness of the love of God.  The beauty of RWUC’s Spiritual Arts Collective Project is that it yokes the artist’s personal transformative power, giving it expression within the context of a community’s corporate commitment to a God of Love, a God of Justice, a God of radical inclusion.